Saturday, October 20, 2012

The Art of the Snake ... Part II

Oceania


Though not as well known, other ancient societies have also paid homage to the humble snake. Estimates date the Australian Aborigine mythology, the Dreamtime, between 50,000 and 65,000 years old. In the Dreamtime, the sacred area where the world was created, and where patterns for living were set down, the Rainbow Serpent is known as Mother of Life, the creator, life giver, the law maker, the protector of the people and the punisher of those who break the laws.

In the Dreamtime, the land was lifeless and flat. When the appropriate time came, the Serpent woke from her sleep and came out of her under ground lair to travel the land. Striking the ground with her head, the Mother of Life created the mountains, and with her body, winding her way across the country side, she created the valleys and river beds; passing through rock she created water holes, and filled them with water. The Serpent brings the rainy season each year, and appears in the sky in the form of the rainbow. With the water she brings, the Rainbow Serpent allows all life to multiply; when tempted by those who break the laws, she brings the floods to punish them. As with all mythology, there are variations of the Dreamtime adapted to reflect conditions, and locality of each Australian tribe of Aborigines.

Aboriginal Snake painting

Storytelling is the way Aborigines pass the Dreamtime from one generation to the next, and sand painting is one of the most artistic forms to express what is known as the Journey, or the subject of their stories. Originally, the paintings were done on the ground, in the desert, as the tribes moved from place to place, using seeds, stones feathers, flowers, and other natural materials to tell the story of the Dreamtime. The paintings were done to the accompaniment of the tribe elders chanting through the process, and passing on their knowledge to the younger members of the tribe, as they described each of the symbols in the paintings.

From the desert floor, the sand paintings acquired a new life as dot paintings on canvas. These dots are created with different size rods which are dipped in paint. The dots and colors are arranged on the canvas in a particular pattern to depict a specific message. These messages, at times relating ceremonial details of a region, are often hidden within the design from the casual viewer, who is not familiar with Aborigine Dreamtime, and its symbols.

Aborigines' lack of written language was compensated with the use of songs and art to pass on their culture to future generaions. Because of the value place on their art, the Aborigine culture is validated and saved from extinction, as it is passed on through the purchase of the dot paintings.


Africa

Mami Wata as a snake charmer

The Mami Wata worship celebrated in Africa and areas of the African Diaspora, with its endless female and male personifications, is associated with water spirits, and more often than not portrayed as a mermaid or as having a female head and torso with the body of a snake, or as a snake charmer. Part cult part religion, Mami Wata is set of diverse beliefs and practices which guide and reflect the ever changing social and religious practices with its mixture of African, Hindu, Muslim and Christian faiths; its personification is not devoted only to a single image, nor is its identity constant: Mami Wata refers to the embodiment of the many water deities, and as with many mythological beings, she embodies complete opposites both good and evil, wealth and poverty, a healer and the source of ailment, a symbol of fidelity as well as lust and promiscuity.

The origins of Mami Wata are lost to history, though in the Dogon creation mythology, the world was created over 4,000 years ago by female and male mermaids called Nommos. The modern Mami Wata is believed to have originated as a “capitalist” deity in the fifteenth century as European commerce, in particular slave trade, brought wealth to various African countries. Mami Wata was thus brought to the Americas where it flourished under different names depending on the local culture.

Mami Wata's association with water is intrinsic to the religion and its worship. Water is the everlasting and ever changing link to the present world, life, death and afterlife; it is the vehicle which carries the soul back home to Africa, and its distant relatives.

Western scholars attribute the name to derive from two African words with origins in ancient Egypt and Ethiopia. Mami derives from “Ma” which means truth or wisdom, and Wata is a corruption of “Uati” which means ocean water. In Mesopotamian mythology and in Babylonian prayers “Mami” is the first great Water Goddess and the creator of human life, and in ancient Egypt, the oldest name for the goddess Isis is Uati.

In art, Mami Wata is portrayed in as many forms as the beliefs which make up the religion allows, and is often dressed in the contemporary attire of the time when the art was created. This contemporary  interpretation of Mami Wata as a Samoan Snake Charmer, c. 1926, is attributed to a German artist by the name of Schlesinger.


Mexico

While few ever think of snake mythology or its worship in the New World, it may come as a surprise to learn that, among the Indigenous Americans, and perhaps more than in any other culture, the snake was most widely worshiped in pre-colonial Mexico, and extending into Central, and South America.


Turquoise mosaic Double Headed Snake, 15th-16th Century CE



The snake held a significant place in the Indigenous Mexican mythology as demonstrated by the many gods whose incarnation was the snake: Xiuhcatl (Fire Serpent), Mixcoatl (Cloud Serpent), Coatlicue (Female of the Serpent Skin) Tlaloc (god of Rain and Fertility), Quetzalcoatl, (feathered serpent) also worshiped by the Mayan and other Mesoamerican cultures (Q'uq'umatz), and many others fill the pantheon of Aztec, Maya, Inca, and other minor tribes' gods. As with other civilizations, the snake, whose cult in Mexico started around 400 B.C.E., was a symbol of rebirth and continuity through its ability to shed its skin and appear to be “reborn,” again. The snake also represented the “bridge” between the underworld, water and sky.


One of the greater gods, Quetzalcoatl, attained its name from two words in Náhuatl, the language of the Aztecs. Quetzal means, aside from the bird whose feathers were symbolically used as decoration, tail feather, and precious; cóatl has the multiple meaning of snake and twin. Combined, the two words became the name of the god, the feathered snake.


This double headed serpent made of wood and covered in turquoise mosaics, oyster and conch shell, and colored resin, was brought back to Europe by Hernán Cortéz, as part of the gifts given to him by Montezuma. Cortéz, according to Aztec mythology, was believed to be the new Quetzalcoatl; instead of saving their culture, as the Aztec believed, Cortéz brought about its end. The back of the snake is hollow and unfinished, though the heads are decorated in front and back. The serpent, 17” x 8” is at the Mexican Gallery, British Museum.

Today, Mexico still honors the snake, giving it prominence in the country's coat of arms and flag since 1821. Legend has it that the god Huitzilopochtli, son of the goddess Coatlicue of the Serpent Skin, told the Aztecs to build the central city of the empire of Tenochtitlan at the location where they saw an eagle, perched on a cactus, with a rattle snake in its claws. When they found the eagle, it was in the middle of the lake Anáhuac. In order to build their city, the Aztecs proceeded to fill the lake by diverting the water, and building reed rafts on which to live and grow food. Today, Lake Anáhuac is Mexico City.






Aboriginal Painting:  Robert Hagan
Mami Wata: Wikipidea
Double Headed Snake: British Museum
Mexico's Coat of Arms:  Newspaper Tree

Home
Page I
Page II


Sunday, October 14, 2012

The Art of the Snake

Hygeia, by Gustav Klimt

THE SNAKE:  As seen through the eyes of Art and Artists throughout the world.


Love them or hate them, few members of the Animal Kingdom are as honored, and at the same time as reviled, as this reptilian descendant of the lizard; nonetheless, snakes have fascinated people since the beginning of time. The oldest mythological symbol encompassing qualities of the male and female, fire and water, and earth, the snake is also symbolic of patience, healing, fertility and birth, power and desire, and has often been used as a guardian of temples and other sacred places. The snake has also been given the negative attributes of vengeance and vindictiveness, qualities best exemplified by humans, and modern science has perfected the use of their venom in the development of medicines.

Through the years, snakes have been portrayed in the various art forms, from the veritable...

"In the Beginning...."  

Adam and Eve by Mattis Pool (1676-1727)
In the Rabbinical tradition, in the Garden of Eden, the snake seduced Eve into eating from the Tree of Knowledge. As a result, Adam and Eve were expelled from their terrestrial paradise, and the serpent was cursed to to crawl on its belly, groveling in the dust for the rest of its life (Genesis).

This copperplate engraving by Mattys Pool (1676-1727) is from a rare book representing the work of Francis van Bossuit, a Flemish ivory sculptor (1635-1692). Pool's engravings were based on the drawings of Dutch painter, Barent Graat (1628-1709), and published the year of Pool's death.

Egypt

Egyptians worshiped and feared the snake, and for them it took a variety of symbols and forms. First and foremost, the snake (cobra) was a powerful deity, Wadjet, which could be seen adorning the Pharaoh's headdresses from predynastic and protodynastic periods, to the end of the Roman occupation. Wadjet was the goddess of Lower Egypt, protector of kings, and of women in childbirth. Another deity, Geb, appears in some depictions with a human body and a snake for its head; in Egyptian mythology, Geb is the god of the Earth, and the father of snakes.

In all its guises, the snake was a powerful symbol for Egyptians, which they believed could bring wealth and salvation to some, and damnation to others.



In Exodus, Moses and his brother Aaron face the Pharaoh, demanding the release of the Hebrews, in the name of Jehovah; “Let my people go....” To prove their god was more powerful, Aaron cast his staff to the ground upon which it turned into a snake. To the Egyptians this act was more magic than divine power, and to prove his superiority, the Pharaoh ordered his sorcerers to duplicated the feat, whose staffs also turned into snakes, but Aaron's staff, then, swallowed up al of the sorcerer's staffs—the pharaoh ignored the symbolic warning that came with Aaron's snake, that the Pharaoh's power was inferior to Aaron's God.

Throughout the Renaissance it was customary for royalty, nobility, and people of power, to represent themselves allegorically. The line between fantasy and reality was blurred when these personages represented themselves as historical figures whose qualities they believed to share, or at the very least, emulate. François II de Dinteville (1498-1554), Bishop of Auxerre, was no exception, and in this painting he is shown with his three brothers as principal protagonists in the dramatic confrontation between Moses and Aaron, and the Pharaoh of Egypt—suggestive of the breakdown in relations between the Dinteville brothers, and the King of France, Francis I, starting in 1538. François II Dinteville is shown as Aaron, the most prominent figure in the painting, and holding the snake; his brother Jean (1504-1555) appears as Moses, in the red striped garment, and to the right of Dinteville. Standing directly behind Moses and Aaron are the two younger Dinteville brothers, Guillaume (1505-1559), and Gaucher (1509-1550). Guillaume is directly to Aaron's left, in the red robe and plumed cap; Gaucher, whose face is framed by Moses' bent arm, is wearing a deep blue robe, and stands behind, and directly between his two oldest brothers. The painting, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, is of French or Dutch origin, by an unknown artist of the Mannerist style.

Another famous Egyptian snake, the Asp, gained notoriety when Cleopatra placed the unsuspecting reptile to her breast. In this allegorical portrait of Cleopatra, by Piero di Cosimo (originally di Lorenzo, 1462-1521), the subject is in fact alleged to be Genoese noblewoman Simonetta Vespucci, whom di Cosimo painted posthumously in 1480, fourteen years after her death. Cleopatra's style is that of late Medieval and early Renaissance periods used by di Cosimo's contemporaries, Anbrogio de Predis (1455-1508), Davide Ghirladaio (1452-1525), Sandro Botticelli (1445-1510) and Jacopo Pontormo (1494-1557): the sitter is shown in a rather flat profile, with an expressionless face, and against a backdrop depicting a setting associated with the sitter.

Cleopatra stares into the distance, defiantly and conscious of her actions, as though pretending to be unaware, to not disturb the the asp, which will soon bite. Of particular interest is the regal detail of the hair, richly decorated with pearls and ribbons, befitting of a queen.

It is not known whether the notation at the bottom of this painting, naming the sitter as Simonetta Vespucci, is original. The painting hangs at the Musée Condé, Chantilly, France.

Greece

According to the various stories in Greek mythology, the god Apollo sent an arrow through the air to pierce the heart of his unfaithful lover, Lapithian princess, Coronis. As she lay dying, Coronis told Apollo that he should have waited for the birth of their son, before killing her. As Coronis lay on the funeral pyre, a remorseful Apollo reached into her womb and saved his son. The child was named, Asclepius, and was given to Cheiron, who taught the infant the arts of healing and hunting. Asclepius also learned the use of drugs, love potions and incantations, and how to perform surgery. When Asclepius brought Hippolytus back from the dead, in exchange for gold, Zeus hurled a thunderbolt to strike Asclepius dead—a mere mortal—for intervening in the natural order of life and death. Realizing that Asclepius had done good to man, Zeus made him a god, and placed him among the stars as the snake bearer, Ophiucus Constellation.

Through the years, the snake wrapped around a staff has been part of medical lore. In Greece, this lore was based on healers treating common infections of parasitic worms, or “fiery serpent,” which were cured by cutting the flesh above the path of the worm. As it crawled out from under the skin, the healer carefully wound the worm around a stick, or rod, until it was fully removed from the patient's body.

The snake, and the staff, not to be confused with Mercury's Caduceus, became the symbol of Asclepius, and consequently of Medicine. Like medicine, the snake (serpent) can be beneficial or harmful, and represents both life and death; its poison, if swallowed, could be a life giving drug; when ingested through the blood stream, it is deadly.


The plate, above, depicting Asclepius is part of a set engraved by Sidney Hall (1788-1831) to go with Jehoshapaha Aspin's A Familiar treatise on astronomy, published in London, 1825. The set of thirty two cards, designed by “a Lady” (Hall), was meant to facilitate the amateur astronomer. Each card, depicting one individual constellation, was pierced with holes of different sizes which, when held against a light, displayed a realistic pattern and magnitude of the stars in each constellation. The set of hand colored cards, published to go along Aspin's text, was called Urania's Mirror.

Hall, a British engraver and cartographer in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, was very popular and respected for his engravings of the United Kingdom and the ancient world, reproduced in many early Nineteenth Century atlases.  

In the portrait below by Peter Paul Rubens, Hygeia (1615), the goddess of Health and Hygiene, and the daughter of Asclepius, is depicted allegorically to reflect northern European features as was the custom, in all painting until the 1800s. Rubens, known for his emphasis on color, movement, and sensuality, created Hyegia in the style he made famous, that of the voluptuous woman. Hygeia gives a restoring tonic to the snake, which like her father's, is her symbol. The mood of the painting is light, to reflect the subject's mythological background of health and healing, though the cloudy background is symbolic of unexpected health issues. 


Hygeia by Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640)

Rubens did two versions of this painting, the other at times referred to as Cleopatra, in which the mood of the painting is much somber, as a result of her affair with Marc Anthony, their defeat by Augustus, and the Roman Emperor's revenge upon the lovers. While Hygeia's face shows care and concern, Cleopatra's face, is pained and anguished, and the colors in the painting are overall darker, moodier, to reflect the subject's frame of mind; the foreboding sky in the background, indicating the final outcome of the scene.  Apart from the overall mood in the two paintings, one major difference is the color of sash:  it is black in Hygeia, and in Cleopatra, it is the same color as the robe.

Both paintings have variously been called by each other's names, and Cleopatra, listed as Hygeia, is  in the Lobkovicz Collection, at the Národní Gallerie, Prague. Hyageia is at the Detroit Institute of Arts.

The painting at the top of this page is also a representation of Hygeia, by Austrian master artist, Gustav Klimt (1862-1918). Originally a triptych to decorate the ceremonial hall at the University of Vienna, the three large paintings, Medicine, Philosophy and Jurisprudence, were commissioned in 1894, but Klimt's work was too controversial for the university professors, whose views the artist attacked in the canvases. After many arguments, Klimt canceled the contract and returned his fees, to the school. When Germany lost World War II, and the Nazis occupying Austria began their retreat, on 7 May, 1945, they set off explosives at Immendrof Castle, where the triptych and ten other of Klimt's paintings were stored. Nothing survived of the castle or the artwork. Luckily for posterity, several pictures of these masterpieces have survived.

It is easy to understand why the paintings were so scandalous. In Medicine, Klimt delivered a haughty Hygeia, disconnected form her surroundings, and the tragedy of nearby humans in different stages of life, and death. Hygeia looks down at the viewer with disdain, barely going through the rituals of her profession, without care or empathy for those in her need.

Another Greek myth is that of the Gorgon Medusa, and her two wicked sisters, Stheno and Euryale. As with all Greek myths the legend of Medusa has different versions. The early accounts tell of Medusa and her sisters as a winged monsters with snakes in their hair and other animal features, and are often depicted as such in early Greek pottery, and sculpture. Later classical writers point to a different Medusa, one who is beautiful, and celebrated for her charms. Poseidon, infatuated with Medusa, raped the maiden in the Temple of Athena. Medusa was punished by an angry Athena for violating her temple, turning the fair maiden into an ugly monster, and giving her snakes instead of hair. In all versions of the legend, Medusa's face and stare will turn any onlooker into stone; and unlike her sisters, Medusa is a mortal, who will be killed by Perseus.

Caravaggio's Medusa c.1598, Uffizi Gallery, Florence

Michaelangelo Merisi (1571-1610) better known as Caravaggio, the name of the town where he grew up, arrived in Rome from northern Italy in 1592. At the time, he was just like hundreds of other young men arrival in the Papal city, aspiring to make a name for himself in the art world. It did not take long, however, for Caravaggio's unconventional, rebellious, and at times dangerous personality, to get him noticed by the nobility and the authorities. His art was just as revolutionary, just as controversial, and just as shocking as Caravaggio was in life, and just as quickly his art received the recognition so desired by the artist.


Caravaggio invented himself, and his art, to follow the same dictum: to break the rules. A contradiction in terms, Caravaggio was a deeply spiritual man, whose complex, haunted, and self destructive personality became his own muse. He painted with, up to then, unknown realism and keen attention to the emotional and physical detail of the human state: his subjects showed real life wrinkles, scars, damaged hands or fingers, dirt on their feet and under their fingernails; his models were chosen (sometimes pulled into the studio from the street) not for their external beauty, but for the qualities they could give the subject to be painted. It can be said that, at once, the viewer can smell the wretchedness and feel transported by the virtues of the subjects being portrayed in the paintings.

At a time when Roman painters were restrained by their techniques and procedures, Caravaggio avoided drawings and painted from life, exclusively. He took the medium of chiaroscuro and made it his own, by redefining the rules. He added an third dimension to the light as it entered the canvas and fell on the subjects. Caravaggio created a brighter and more translucent light, resulting in deeper, darker shadows, which gave the composition, or subject of the painting, an illusory quality of floating on the canvas. Caravaggio's technique elevated realism to its highest level, and demanded its marriage to the drama being portrayed. In the process, he erased the space between life and art, making the viewer, for the first time, become an active participant of the action on the canvas. Caravaggio's work shocked and pleased his patrons, whose regal sensibilities were offended or awakened by the crude realism of the people he portrayed, on canvas. The artists in Rome and elsewhere shared the same reaction: those more stablished, feared and were loath of him, the younger generations saw him as their artistic savior and followed his techniques.

In this portrait of Medusa, Caravaggio's intense realism becomes almost disturbing, and self-fulfilling: as in his other paintings with severed heads, it is the artist who is being represented. In Medusa, it is not mythology, nor the snakes, but Caravaggio's features, which call attention to the canvas; it is his shock, anger, pity, frustration, helplessness, and surprise, coupled with a silent scream which haunt the viewer, like the echo of a nightmare. Medusa is on canvas what Caravaggio was in life: enigmatic.

Caravaggio's genius laid the foundations for the Baroque movement in art, but his accomplishments were overshadowed by his temper and volatile character. His life was difficult to sort out, much less understood, and as rapidly as he gained popularity while living, Caravaggio was almost as rapidly forgotten in death.

Home
Part II